| How to assess and evaluate design thinking? | ||||||
| By using the design process as a guide, students can capture their thinking. Products can be generated to provide evidence of each step in the process. In these products of evidence, teachers can find a student's level of understanding, knowledge, and skill. | ||||||
| Project Assessment Chart | ||||||
| Outstanding | . | Good | . | Satisfactory | . | Needs Improvement | . | ||||
| Content and Accuracy |
. | ·All
information was precise and accurate · All facts and materials were relevant to the topic · All information was clearly presented · The audience clearly learned something |
. | ·
Mostly accurate, a few inconsistencies · Most facts and materials were relevant · The information was clearly presented · The audience clearly learned something |
. | ·
Somewhat accurate: more than a few errors or inconsistencies · Most facts and materials were relevant · The audience learned something |
. | ·
Mostly inaccurate: the facts in this presentation were misleading to the
audience. · Ideas were not presented coherently and distracted the audience |
|||
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |||||
| Visual Presentation |
. | ·
Extremely well organized · Presented with originality and unique approach · Large enough for all to see · A variety of visuals was used |
. | ·
Very well organized logical format · Presented with originality and unique approach · Large enough for all to see |
. | ·
Somewhat organized but most facts did not follow smoothly from one idea
to another · Not large enough for all to see |
. | ·
Choppy and confusing · Little creative energy was used · No new knowledge was presented |
|||
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |||||
| Presentation Mechanics |
. | ·
Captured interest of the audience · Constant eye contact with the audience · Was very well prepared and rehearsed · Voice was loud and clear |
. | ·
Captured interest of the audience · Frequent eye contact with the audience · Was somewhat prepared and rehearsed |
. | ·
Sometimes captured the interest of the audience · Some eye contact with the audience · Voice was inaudible · Was somewhat prepared and rehearsed |
. | ·
Did not capture the interest of the audience · Little eye contact with the audience · Was not prepared |
|||
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |||||
| Criteria | . | ·
Met all criteria · Creative and efficient use of resources · Understood strategies · Solution is workable |
. | ·
Met most of the criteria · Efficient use of resources · Understood most of the strategies · Solution could be workable |
. | ·
Met some of the criteria · Did not define the strategies or outcomes · Solution could not work |
. | ·
Met none of the criteria · Inefficient use of materials · Did not define the strategies or outcomes · Solution could not work |
|||
| . | . | . | . | . |
| - | - | . | . | |||||||||||||
| Links: | Home | - | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | Step 5 | Step 6 | Step 7 | Step 8 | . | LEGO dacta | LEGO Cad | Autodesk | CyberToys | . |